Coinbase Wants to Convince SEC Staked Tokens Are Not Securities

Tuesday, 21/03/2023 | 10:18 GMT by Damian Chmiel
  • In 'Petition for Rulemaking', Coinbase convinces that 'staking services are not a monolith'.
  • The exchange states that SEC actions may decrease the US crypto market competitiveness.
cryptocurrency insurance companies

The publicly traded and one of the biggest crypto exchanges in the ecosystem, Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), has prepared an 18-page document titled the 'Petition for Rulemaking' which objective is to convince US regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), that staking should not be put under the same regulatory framework as securities.

Coinbase Disagrees with SEC Statement on Staking

Cryptocurrency holders can receive rewards as an incentive by staking their cryptos with a blockchain validator. These rewards typically come in the form of newly mined cryptocurrencies. However, in exchange for these rewards, the holders lose control over their original holdings until they decide to unstake them.

Staking is a popular service among crypto exchange and digital assets providers. However, it has recently come under closer scrutiny by regulators, including the SEC. The US market watchdog claims that at least some of the staked tokens resemble securities and should therefore be covered by the same rules. In the institution's view, offering staking without obtaining the relevant authorizations and licenses breaches the US Securities Act.

Binance disagrees with this statement and has proactively communicated on the matter of cryptocurrency staking. The petition focuses on showing how securities regulations treat proof-of-stake services, and it explains that they are essentially not the same as securities.

Coinbase's publication highlights the nuanced nature of staking as an operation concept, emphasizing that it is not a monolith. While specific staking models may qualify as investment contract offerings, others do not. In particular, Coinbase asserts that core staking services fall outside the Howey test criteria that the SEC uses to determine whether an asset is a security.

"The risk of getting regulation wrong is that innovation moves offshore to jurisdictions that do get it right. The US is competing with the EU, UK, Hong Kong, Singapore, UAE, and a host of other countries that are racing to establish crypto hubs by proposing clear regulatory frameworks. Letting critical infrastructure migrate to other jurisdictions – the validators that are paid through staking services – because rules in the US are inappropriate is unnecessary," Coinbase commented in the petition.

SEC Looks at Binance's and Kraken's Hands

Coinbase's actions come a month after cryptocurrency exchange Kraken had shut down its staking-as-a-service in the US and paid $30 million to settle with the SEC. The SEC raised risk-related concerns on the platforms offering staking-as-a-service as they have "very little protection."

In addition, the cryptocurrency exchange has stated that it plans to provide staking services to non-US customers through a distinct subsidiary, despite the recent settlement. Notably, the settlement agreement between the SEC and Kraken was reached in a mere day after media reports surfaced regarding an ongoing regulatory inquiry into the exchange's alleged offering of unregistered securities.

A few days later, crypto company Paxos halted the issuance of new BUSD stablecoins owned by Binance. This was after news that the company faced an SEC lawsuit for violating consumer protection rules.

In addition, Binance, one of the world's largest crypto exchanges, has faced some compliance "gaps" in the past and expects to pay fines to settle with US regulators, which was admitted by Patrick Hillmann, the company's Chief Strategy Officer (CSO), in an interview and was published after BUSD turmoil.

The publicly traded and one of the biggest crypto exchanges in the ecosystem, Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), has prepared an 18-page document titled the 'Petition for Rulemaking' which objective is to convince US regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), that staking should not be put under the same regulatory framework as securities.

Coinbase Disagrees with SEC Statement on Staking

Cryptocurrency holders can receive rewards as an incentive by staking their cryptos with a blockchain validator. These rewards typically come in the form of newly mined cryptocurrencies. However, in exchange for these rewards, the holders lose control over their original holdings until they decide to unstake them.

Staking is a popular service among crypto exchange and digital assets providers. However, it has recently come under closer scrutiny by regulators, including the SEC. The US market watchdog claims that at least some of the staked tokens resemble securities and should therefore be covered by the same rules. In the institution's view, offering staking without obtaining the relevant authorizations and licenses breaches the US Securities Act.

Binance disagrees with this statement and has proactively communicated on the matter of cryptocurrency staking. The petition focuses on showing how securities regulations treat proof-of-stake services, and it explains that they are essentially not the same as securities.

Coinbase's publication highlights the nuanced nature of staking as an operation concept, emphasizing that it is not a monolith. While specific staking models may qualify as investment contract offerings, others do not. In particular, Coinbase asserts that core staking services fall outside the Howey test criteria that the SEC uses to determine whether an asset is a security.

"The risk of getting regulation wrong is that innovation moves offshore to jurisdictions that do get it right. The US is competing with the EU, UK, Hong Kong, Singapore, UAE, and a host of other countries that are racing to establish crypto hubs by proposing clear regulatory frameworks. Letting critical infrastructure migrate to other jurisdictions – the validators that are paid through staking services – because rules in the US are inappropriate is unnecessary," Coinbase commented in the petition.

SEC Looks at Binance's and Kraken's Hands

Coinbase's actions come a month after cryptocurrency exchange Kraken had shut down its staking-as-a-service in the US and paid $30 million to settle with the SEC. The SEC raised risk-related concerns on the platforms offering staking-as-a-service as they have "very little protection."

In addition, the cryptocurrency exchange has stated that it plans to provide staking services to non-US customers through a distinct subsidiary, despite the recent settlement. Notably, the settlement agreement between the SEC and Kraken was reached in a mere day after media reports surfaced regarding an ongoing regulatory inquiry into the exchange's alleged offering of unregistered securities.

A few days later, crypto company Paxos halted the issuance of new BUSD stablecoins owned by Binance. This was after news that the company faced an SEC lawsuit for violating consumer protection rules.

In addition, Binance, one of the world's largest crypto exchanges, has faced some compliance "gaps" in the past and expects to pay fines to settle with US regulators, which was admitted by Patrick Hillmann, the company's Chief Strategy Officer (CSO), in an interview and was published after BUSD turmoil.

About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel
  • 1933 Articles
  • 44 Followers
Damian's adventure with financial markets began at the Cracow University of Economics, where he obtained his MA in finance and accounting. Starting from the retail trader perspective, he collaborated with brokerage houses and financial portals in Poland as an independent editor and content manager. His adventure with Finance Magnates began in 2016, where he is working as a business intelligence analyst.

More from the Author

CryptoCurrency