The tension between the US House Financial Services Committee and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) escalated today (Wednesday) after the Chair of the committee, Representative Patrick McHenry, suggested that he may use a subpoena against the commission to acquire critical documents about the former CEO of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried.

SEC Accused of "Lack of Responsiveness"

McHenry accused the Chairman, Gary Gensler of attempting to stifle the digital asset ecosystem while failing to maintain transparency in the SEC's dealings with Congress. This clash dates back to February when the committee, under McHenry's leadership, initially requested documents related to communications between the SEC's staff and the Justice Department concerning the charges against Bankman-Fried.

McHenry said: "Your lack of responsiveness to this committee's legitimate oversight continues to be unacceptable. In February, this committee made multiple requests for documents to the SEC. Yet, seven months later, the committee has not received a single non-public document that was not part of a FOIA production."

The committee had previously made multiple requests for documents, particularly concerning the timing of SBF's arrest, considering his scheduled appearance before Congress. However, these requests have yielded no non-public documents besides those obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

McHenry renewed these requests in April and May, dissatisfied with the SEC's provision of only publicly available information. Thus, McHenry conveyed his impatience, emphasizing that the SEC is not above the law and should be responsive to congressional oversight like other financial regulators.

He added that he did not wish to be the first Chairman of the Financial Services committee to issue a subpoena to the SEC, urging Gensler to consider the long-lasting consequences of his actions on the agency's reputation.

Gensler Defends SEC

In response, Gensler defended the SEC's regulatory actions, saying the agency's responsibility is to protect investors and ensure transparent disclosure. He emphasized the importance of compliance Compliance In finance, banking, investing, and insurance compliance refers to following the rules or orders set down by the government regulatory authority, either as providing a service or processing a transaction. Compliance concerning finance would also be a state of being following established guidelines or specifications. This designation can also encompass efforts to ensure that organizations are abiding by both industry regulations and government legislation. Understanding ComplianceCompliance is a In finance, banking, investing, and insurance compliance refers to following the rules or orders set down by the government regulatory authority, either as providing a service or processing a transaction. Compliance concerning finance would also be a state of being following established guidelines or specifications. This designation can also encompass efforts to ensure that organizations are abiding by both industry regulations and government legislation. Understanding ComplianceCompliance is a Read this Term to safeguard the users of crypto platforms and investors, calling for proper protection of customer funds and separating conflicting lines of business.

Last year, the SEC formally charged Bankman-Fried, the CEO and Co-Founder of FTX, with orchestrating a scheme to defraud investors. Bankman-Fried, once celebrated for his role in the crypto world, is facing allegations of concealing the diversion of FTX customers' funds through his crypto hedge fund, Alameda Research.

But, McHenry has pointed out that the SEC's current approach to rulemaking potentially threatens the integrity of financial markets and poses risks to investors. McHenry stressed the need for a comprehensive economic analysis of the proposed rules and their combined impact, accusing the commission of failing to carry out such assessments adequately.

Additionally, McHenry criticized the SEC for not prioritizing capital formation, noting a glaring absence of initiatives aimed at improving access to capital or enhancing market competitiveness within the agency's rulemaking agenda.