Speaking with several high profile venture capital firms about how they view Fintech startups, there are currently two main classifications; those with innovative technology and those without it. The innovators are the ones that have created technology solutions to more efficiently provide financial services. This group includes processes for firms to automate portions of their compliance process, technology to better secure online financial portals as well as algorithms to better analyze borrower data to offer loans faster and at better rates.
On the other side are fintech firms whose underlying technology isn’t much different from their competitors, and may be sourced from a third party. Without a unique solution, these firms risk becoming commoditized. Nonetheless, many such fintech startups do command impressive valuations thanks to their marketing prowess that has allowed them to attract growing groups of clients.
Also, the line between creating your own technology and using third party solutions has been thinning. While white label turnkey products that just have different skins will never be confused with proprietary solutions, many technology firms license modules to complement their overall products. Within fintech, this often takes the form of charting and other data visualization tools which make more sense to license then to develop internally, but that don’t detract from a startup’s overall control of their technology.
In addition, fintech remains a hot sector, with many startups in areas such as digital banks, online lending, alternative Payments and robo-advisory set to continue growing as consumer awareness of such offerings increases. As a result, due to changing customer habits and the ability to provide services more efficiently, there are opportunities for new fintech services entrants despite their lack of proprietary or unique systems.
Fintech as a service
Aiming to service this fast growing sector, and lowering the barriers to entering the industry, is SDK.finance, a creation of Czech Republic based Cyber Force Group. Rather than offering solutions to consumers, SDK.finance provides backend technology that enables other businesses to operate digital fintech services. Among their products are backend components for E-Wallets, prepaid bank cards, online lending, mPOS acquiring, and P2P money transfer payment systems that are used to assist firms in launching their own digital solutions.
It’s not just saving time in development but also recruiting employees and training them
SDK.finance’s philosophy is that they believe that many firms are better suited saving their time and money on building their business instead of developing all of their technology. The company’s offering focuses on backend infrastructure. The solution is offered as a software as a service (SaaS) product, with customers paying a subscription fee to use the underlying backend infrastructure which connects with their frontend product and database.
Alexey Malyshev, CMO at SDK.finance, explained that “their clients are looking for full control”. To do this, SDK.finance provides the backend infrastructure to help power the fintech products, but their customers are responsible for the development of the front-end client facing interface as well as their database. The result is that even though SDK.finance may provide assistance or introduce partners to help with frontend and database building, the ownership of the database and frontend customizations of the product are in the full control of the client.
Through this model, Malyshev expressed that he believes firms can save three to six months of their development time by sourcing backend solutions from SDK.finance. He explained that “it’s not just saving time in development but also recruiting employees and training them” that adds up.
Why is SDK.finance important? Because everyone is a fintech firm
One of the results of the migration of banking, payments and overall finance to a digital and mobile world is the emergence of new players. The best example is Kenya’s successful mobile payments network, mPesa, which is the product of telecom carriers and not financial institutions. Using their telecom network, mPesa has become a ‘bank of sorts’, and is used as an alternative for not just transferring payments, but also to store deposits.
Elsewhere, well before global giants Samsung and Apple, who also aren’t financial firms, launched their payment initiatives, Starbucks was leading the way in app based mobile payments. The common denominator of these alternative fintech entrants is a large customer base that is being leveraged to introduce a financial product.
Overall, taking advantage of a pre-existing client base to upsell financial products isn’t necessarily a new thing. The prime example is offering credit, where scores of retailers have partnered with banks and credit card companies to provide branded cards to their customers. Also, many hardware and automobile firms have similarly launched financing units to provide new sources of revenues.
Looking ahead, with SaaS turnkey fintech solutions, the next generation of these forays into finance should have an even easier time launching products that compete with traditional financial firms. Following mPesa’s success, several telecom firms are trying to replicate a mobile based payment network for cross border transfer.
Other potential examples can be a global convenience store such as 7/11 that creates a money transfer and eWallet system to compete with firms such as Western Union. In addition, a large accounting firm servicing SMEs could use solutions from SDK.finance or other similar companies to start offering billing and invoicing solutions. In addition, they could partner with investors to add online lending services.
The bottom line trend is that innovations in financial technology are allowing practically any firm to become a fintech player. For companies with entrenched customer bases, adding fintech services is a potential source for new revenues. In SDK.finance’s case, Malyshev stated that although initial demand for their solutions has been from startups, they are also gaining interest from more established firms as well as banks.
Revenues vs proprietary systems
Returning to the question of whether a firm is best suited to own their technology is one that needs to be answered. Malyshev answered that “the idea to own your own technology isn’t always right” adding that “you need to own market share and have customers”. He further explained that a firm can always make the leap to fully own all of their source code in the future. But, using solutions such as those from SDK.finance are a great way for a firm to get to market quickly to validate their business and begin to acquire customers.
Fintech Spotlight is a new column on Finance Magnates devoted to reviewing innovative financial technology companies and sector trends.