Exclusive: U.S. Q1 2015 Forex Profitability Report, More Accounts and Profits

Thursday, 23/04/2015 | 10:16 GMT by Ron Finberg
  • The Q1 2015 US Forex Profitability Report showed more traders in the country traded and were more profitable than Q4 2014, with IB on top.
Exclusive: U.S. Q1 2015 Forex Profitability Report, More Accounts and Profits
Bloomberg

With the Forex market experiencing a surge in Volatility and volumes during the first quarter of 2015, how was client performance affected? Providing a spotlight is today’s release of the U.S. retail forex market profitability and active accounts size for Q1 2015.

In reference to the results, figures for MB Trading are our estimates as finalized data could not be sourced before publishing. Also, in Q4 2014, the results for InteractiveBrokers were incorrectly reported. Active accounts were understated by approximately 3,000 customers.

Turning to Q1’s figures, results from reporting brokers showed that the U.S. forex market grew by 3,938 or 4.3% to 96,112 active accounts traded during the quarter. Profitability also improved, with weighted averages revealing that 36.4% of US customers were in the black during Q1, compared to 36.2% in Q4 2014. Non-weighted averages that that don’t take a broker’s account numbers into consideration and count individual firms equally, showed that profitability for the average U.S. broker decreased by to 34.2% compared to 34.8% in Q4 2014.

Q1 2015 US Retail Forex Profitability report (source: Finance Magnates)

Q1 2015 US Retail Forex Profitability report (source: Finance Magnates)

Among individual firms, two that are worth highlighting for contrasting reasons are InteractiveBrokers and OANDA. At OANDA, active account numbers remained firm, as they grew by 49 to 20,747, but profitability declined to 32.5% from 35.8%. As it is considered a low spread broker, OANDA has typically been ranked among brokers with more profitable customers in the U.S., topping the list during Q2 2014 with a 45.5% rate. However, they have also been reporting wider than average variances in profitability among their U.S. customers. In the past, OANDA has attributed this phenomenon as being U.S. specific due to domestic trader habits, and is not necessarily indicative of global customer performance.

In regards to InteractiveBrokers, the firm continues to hold onto its claim of having the most profitable traders, topping this quarter’s list at 45.5%. In addition, they reported the highest amount of active U.S. customers, with account growth of 8.3% to 30,398. The addition of 2,330 active accounts occurred even as rivals have struggled to meaningfully increase their U.S. businesses without acquisitions.

Speaking about their account growth and customer profitability, Andrew Wilkinson, Chief Market Analyst at InteractiveBrokers explained to Finance Magnates that they believe customers benefit from their low fees and tight spreads. He also attributed higher profitability to having a more experienced customer base, stating that the firm is “known for its technology among professional and savvy traders”.

As for customer growth, Wilkinson explained that the firm reported record new account openings in Q1 2015 for their multi-asset universal trading offering. He related that offering a variety of assets, makes it difficult to determine what drives forex specific business, but that all business lines benefit from the broker’s low costs to customers. In terms of specific areas of strength, Wilkinson noted they are experiencing growth internationally and in the advisor space.

When asked about the post Swiss franc crisis landscape for onboarding new customers, Wilkinson answered that the firm’s size and strong capital base may be helping them now, stating “New clients opening a Universal Account with Interactive Brokers have access to many trading products. This makes it difficult to state whether a new client is joining solely to trade currencies. That said, the SNB crisis may have even had a positive impact on account growth at IB, as clients of more vulnerable brokers looked to move their accounts elsewhere.”

Among other individual brokers, worth noting is FXCM’s account profitability improvement to 33% from 30% in Q1 2015. The broker has reported some of the poorest performances from their customers in the past, due in part to their wide spreads. However, the decision to decrease spreads at the U.S. unit at the end of 2014 appears to have assisted customers in performing better during Q1 2015. The higher profitability occurs, even as FXCM has reported that these same customers have been increasing their volumes substantially, over-trading often being a leading cause of losses for retail traders.

Also worth noting is the 8.9% improvement of active customers at GAIN Capital to a total of 12,199. Since peaking at 12,384 during Q1 2013 following their acquisition of GFT’s U.S. business at the end of 2012, active U.S. account numbers at GAIN had been trending lower. As such, the Q1 increase can be viewed as a sign of strength in the US for GAIN.

Previous Reports: Q4 2014, Q3 2014, Q2 2014, Q1 2014, Q4 2013, Q3 2013, Q2 2013, Q1 2013, Q4 2012, Q3 2012, Q2 2012, Q1 2012

With the Forex market experiencing a surge in Volatility and volumes during the first quarter of 2015, how was client performance affected? Providing a spotlight is today’s release of the U.S. retail forex market profitability and active accounts size for Q1 2015.

In reference to the results, figures for MB Trading are our estimates as finalized data could not be sourced before publishing. Also, in Q4 2014, the results for InteractiveBrokers were incorrectly reported. Active accounts were understated by approximately 3,000 customers.

Turning to Q1’s figures, results from reporting brokers showed that the U.S. forex market grew by 3,938 or 4.3% to 96,112 active accounts traded during the quarter. Profitability also improved, with weighted averages revealing that 36.4% of US customers were in the black during Q1, compared to 36.2% in Q4 2014. Non-weighted averages that that don’t take a broker’s account numbers into consideration and count individual firms equally, showed that profitability for the average U.S. broker decreased by to 34.2% compared to 34.8% in Q4 2014.

Q1 2015 US Retail Forex Profitability report (source: Finance Magnates)

Q1 2015 US Retail Forex Profitability report (source: Finance Magnates)

Among individual firms, two that are worth highlighting for contrasting reasons are InteractiveBrokers and OANDA. At OANDA, active account numbers remained firm, as they grew by 49 to 20,747, but profitability declined to 32.5% from 35.8%. As it is considered a low spread broker, OANDA has typically been ranked among brokers with more profitable customers in the U.S., topping the list during Q2 2014 with a 45.5% rate. However, they have also been reporting wider than average variances in profitability among their U.S. customers. In the past, OANDA has attributed this phenomenon as being U.S. specific due to domestic trader habits, and is not necessarily indicative of global customer performance.

In regards to InteractiveBrokers, the firm continues to hold onto its claim of having the most profitable traders, topping this quarter’s list at 45.5%. In addition, they reported the highest amount of active U.S. customers, with account growth of 8.3% to 30,398. The addition of 2,330 active accounts occurred even as rivals have struggled to meaningfully increase their U.S. businesses without acquisitions.

Speaking about their account growth and customer profitability, Andrew Wilkinson, Chief Market Analyst at InteractiveBrokers explained to Finance Magnates that they believe customers benefit from their low fees and tight spreads. He also attributed higher profitability to having a more experienced customer base, stating that the firm is “known for its technology among professional and savvy traders”.

As for customer growth, Wilkinson explained that the firm reported record new account openings in Q1 2015 for their multi-asset universal trading offering. He related that offering a variety of assets, makes it difficult to determine what drives forex specific business, but that all business lines benefit from the broker’s low costs to customers. In terms of specific areas of strength, Wilkinson noted they are experiencing growth internationally and in the advisor space.

When asked about the post Swiss franc crisis landscape for onboarding new customers, Wilkinson answered that the firm’s size and strong capital base may be helping them now, stating “New clients opening a Universal Account with Interactive Brokers have access to many trading products. This makes it difficult to state whether a new client is joining solely to trade currencies. That said, the SNB crisis may have even had a positive impact on account growth at IB, as clients of more vulnerable brokers looked to move their accounts elsewhere.”

Among other individual brokers, worth noting is FXCM’s account profitability improvement to 33% from 30% in Q1 2015. The broker has reported some of the poorest performances from their customers in the past, due in part to their wide spreads. However, the decision to decrease spreads at the U.S. unit at the end of 2014 appears to have assisted customers in performing better during Q1 2015. The higher profitability occurs, even as FXCM has reported that these same customers have been increasing their volumes substantially, over-trading often being a leading cause of losses for retail traders.

Also worth noting is the 8.9% improvement of active customers at GAIN Capital to a total of 12,199. Since peaking at 12,384 during Q1 2013 following their acquisition of GFT’s U.S. business at the end of 2012, active U.S. account numbers at GAIN had been trending lower. As such, the Q1 increase can be viewed as a sign of strength in the US for GAIN.

Previous Reports: Q4 2014, Q3 2014, Q2 2014, Q1 2014, Q4 2013, Q3 2013, Q2 2013, Q1 2013, Q4 2012, Q3 2012, Q2 2012, Q1 2012

About the Author: Ron Finberg
Ron Finberg
  • 1983 Articles
  • 8 Followers
Ron Finberg, a specialist in regulatory issues, brings clarity and depth to finance news

More from the Author

Retail FX