Robert Tchenguiz Loses Legal Battle against CMC

Saturday, 02/07/2022 | 10:00 GMT by Bilal Jafar
  • The British property tycoon has been ordered to pay £1.31 million to CMC.
  • Tchenguiz was accused of failing to pay his debt.
Court 880x400
court room

Robert Tchenguiz, the UK-based entrepreneur and one of the well-known property investors, has lost a court fight against CMC Spreadbet Plc. According to the official details of the case, the company sued Tchenguiz after he failed to pay his debt.

David Elvin QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, ruled in favor of CMC and ordered the British property tycoon to pay £1.31 million to the company. The court highlighted that Tchenguiz was ‘lawfully’ categorized as a professional client.

In an official statement released by Tchenguiz, the British entrepreneur said that he is planning to appeal against the decision.

“In my judgment, the Defendant was lawfully categorized as a professional client, and CMC did not fail to comply with the duty in COBS to give appropriate warnings with regard to the loss of protections and rights which he would have enjoyed as a retail client but not as a professional client. Further, for the reasons I have given, I reject the Defendant's contentions that in closing out his account CMC breached the Braganza duty or failed to comply with COBS 2.1.1R and the duty to act in the best interests of its client,” Judge David Elvin said in the ruling on Friday.

Background

The debt arose after the coronavirus-led market plunge caused a major dip in the shares of FirstGroup Plc. In 2019, Tchenguiz had a decent stake in FirstGroup. By March 2020, he increased his exposure in FirstGroup through a series of positions.

"It follows that the claim succeeds, the Defendant is indebted to CMC in the sum of £1.31 million together with interest due," Elvin added.

Robert Tchenguiz, the UK-based entrepreneur and one of the well-known property investors, has lost a court fight against CMC Spreadbet Plc. According to the official details of the case, the company sued Tchenguiz after he failed to pay his debt.

David Elvin QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, ruled in favor of CMC and ordered the British property tycoon to pay £1.31 million to the company. The court highlighted that Tchenguiz was ‘lawfully’ categorized as a professional client.

In an official statement released by Tchenguiz, the British entrepreneur said that he is planning to appeal against the decision.

“In my judgment, the Defendant was lawfully categorized as a professional client, and CMC did not fail to comply with the duty in COBS to give appropriate warnings with regard to the loss of protections and rights which he would have enjoyed as a retail client but not as a professional client. Further, for the reasons I have given, I reject the Defendant's contentions that in closing out his account CMC breached the Braganza duty or failed to comply with COBS 2.1.1R and the duty to act in the best interests of its client,” Judge David Elvin said in the ruling on Friday.

Background

The debt arose after the coronavirus-led market plunge caused a major dip in the shares of FirstGroup Plc. In 2019, Tchenguiz had a decent stake in FirstGroup. By March 2020, he increased his exposure in FirstGroup through a series of positions.

"It follows that the claim succeeds, the Defendant is indebted to CMC in the sum of £1.31 million together with interest due," Elvin added.

About the Author: Bilal Jafar
Bilal Jafar
  • 2440 Articles
  • 87 Followers
About the Author: Bilal Jafar
Bilal Jafar holds an MBA in Finance. In a professional career of more than 8 years, Jafar covered the evolution of FX, Cryptocurrencies, and Fintech. He started his career as a financial markets analyst and worked in different positions in the global media sector. Jafar writes about diverse topics within FX, Crypto, and the financial technology market.
  • 2440 Articles
  • 87 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}