Pairing and Matching under EMIR Refit Has Gone Live: How Shall Brokers Prepare?

Thursday, 10/10/2024 | 10:38 GMT by Quinn Perrott
  • Pairing and matching is great when it works, as it allows a firm to see what values their counterparty has reported.
  • There are a total of 89 fields that are eligible for reconciliation but a lot of them are only relevant to certain asset classes or trading venues.
brokers need to ensure the following for the new EMIR Refit

EMIR Trade Repositories (TRs) have now started giving reporting entities feedback on their pairing and matching status in the form of an end of day report in respect of the new EMIR Refit.

Brokers need to be aware of this process and ensure that their regulatory reporting team (or external provider) is:

· Attending to these reports which come from the TR each day,

· Identifying which counterparties are included in the report as also having a reporting obligation (especially where you had not previously conducted an exercise of preparing for the pairing and matching requirement),

· Understand why there are mis-matches in paired transactions,

· Liaising with counterparties to align the relevant fields to prevent mis-matches re-occurring, and

· Making changes to the reporting systems and processes where necessary.

Lets us explore the pairing and matching process undertaken by the LSEG Regulatory Reporting TR.

What Is Pairing and Matching?

Pairing is the process where the TR identifies and pairs the two sides of the same transaction using the following fields:

· Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI),

· Counterparty 1; and

· Counterparty 2.

Matching is the process the TR does (after successful pairing) to match certain fields of the 2 reported sides of a trade.

Once the trades are paired, you will be able to see the values your counterparty reported that didn’t match (see example below).

How Does Pairing and Matching Benefit a Firm?

Pairing and matching is great when it works, as it allows a firm to see what values their counterparty has reported. This allows a kind of real time audit and reconciliation between the 2 parties so that if one party gets a value wrong, hopefully their counterparty will get it right. The parties will then engage in dialogue on their conflicting data values and improve their process in near real time.

What Are the Relevant Fields and Do Hey Need to Match Exactly?

Firstly, the TR doesn’t necessarily try to pair every trade. The pairing is only attempted if the field 'Reporting obligation of counterparty 2' is set to ‘TRUE’.

Secondly, whilst there is pairing between TRs in the same jurisdiction, there is currently no formal pairing across jurisdictions, i.e. a trade done by an EU investment firm with a UK investment firm will not be paired.

There are a total of 89 fields that are eligible for reconciliation but a lot of them are only relevant to certain asset classes or trading venues.

Some fields have reconciliation tolerances to allow for different timing and rounding and other factors that may result in a different value from each counterparty being ‘normal’.

To see our comprehensive Table click here and be directed to the full version of the article.

Brokers should make sure they are attending to these pairing and matching reports each day. Review the recommended action items above and make sure you understand where your reporting standards need to get to. Ensure that there is a clear record of constant improvement in your arrangements with counterparties to make sure that mismatches in reporting are rare, rather than systemic.

EMIR Trade Repositories (TRs) have now started giving reporting entities feedback on their pairing and matching status in the form of an end of day report in respect of the new EMIR Refit.

Brokers need to be aware of this process and ensure that their regulatory reporting team (or external provider) is:

· Attending to these reports which come from the TR each day,

· Identifying which counterparties are included in the report as also having a reporting obligation (especially where you had not previously conducted an exercise of preparing for the pairing and matching requirement),

· Understand why there are mis-matches in paired transactions,

· Liaising with counterparties to align the relevant fields to prevent mis-matches re-occurring, and

· Making changes to the reporting systems and processes where necessary.

Lets us explore the pairing and matching process undertaken by the LSEG Regulatory Reporting TR.

What Is Pairing and Matching?

Pairing is the process where the TR identifies and pairs the two sides of the same transaction using the following fields:

· Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI),

· Counterparty 1; and

· Counterparty 2.

Matching is the process the TR does (after successful pairing) to match certain fields of the 2 reported sides of a trade.

Once the trades are paired, you will be able to see the values your counterparty reported that didn’t match (see example below).

How Does Pairing and Matching Benefit a Firm?

Pairing and matching is great when it works, as it allows a firm to see what values their counterparty has reported. This allows a kind of real time audit and reconciliation between the 2 parties so that if one party gets a value wrong, hopefully their counterparty will get it right. The parties will then engage in dialogue on their conflicting data values and improve their process in near real time.

What Are the Relevant Fields and Do Hey Need to Match Exactly?

Firstly, the TR doesn’t necessarily try to pair every trade. The pairing is only attempted if the field 'Reporting obligation of counterparty 2' is set to ‘TRUE’.

Secondly, whilst there is pairing between TRs in the same jurisdiction, there is currently no formal pairing across jurisdictions, i.e. a trade done by an EU investment firm with a UK investment firm will not be paired.

There are a total of 89 fields that are eligible for reconciliation but a lot of them are only relevant to certain asset classes or trading venues.

Some fields have reconciliation tolerances to allow for different timing and rounding and other factors that may result in a different value from each counterparty being ‘normal’.

To see our comprehensive Table click here and be directed to the full version of the article.

Brokers should make sure they are attending to these pairing and matching reports each day. Review the recommended action items above and make sure you understand where your reporting standards need to get to. Ensure that there is a clear record of constant improvement in your arrangements with counterparties to make sure that mismatches in reporting are rare, rather than systemic.

About the Author: Quinn Perrott
Quinn Perrott
  • 11 Articles
  • 7 Followers
Quinn is Co-CEO and founder of TRAction and focuses on assisting clients in Europe, Asia and Australia to meet their regulatory requirements with trade and transaction reporting solutions as well as development of the best execution platform. With a background in IT, Quinn started in the financial markets as IT Manager for City Index. He then co-founded and worked as a General Manager at one of Australia’s largest margin FX and CFD providers. Quinn has provided educational sessions to Australia’s regulatory bodies in relation to operational aspects of derivatives and trading platforms.

More from the Author

Retail FX