This New Zealand Broker Loses License after 5 Years Battling the Regulator

Monday, 09/09/2024 | 07:39 GMT by Damian Chmiel
  • Rockfort Markets has been stripped of its derivative issuer license.
  • High Court upholds FMA decision citing multiple material contraventions.
New Zealand
Bloomberg

The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) of New Zealand has cancelled the derivative issuer license of Rockfort Markets Limited, following a dismissed appeal in the High Court. The cancellation, effective July 19, 2024, comes after five years of regulatory scrutiny and failed attempts at compliance.

New Zealand Regulator Cancels Rockfort Markets' Derivatives License After Failed Appeal

Justice Edwards of the High Court upheld the FMA's March 2023 decision to cancel Rockfort's license, citing multiple material contraventions of license obligations. The court found that Rockfort had breached at least eight of its license conditions, including failure to comply with a previous FMA Direction Order and inadequate systems for ensuring compliance with advertising regulations.

Liam Mason, FMA General Counsel
Liam Mason, FMA General Counsel

“Removing a market license is one of our most significant interventions,” said Liam Mason, FMA General Counsel. “The serious and widespread nature of the contraventions, combined with Rockfort's compliance history and lack of improvement following earlier actions, led us to conclude that Rockfort is not fit to hold a license.”

Rockfort's troubles began as early as 2019 when the FMA first raised concerns about potentially misleading advertising. Despite repeated engagements with the regulator, Rockfort failed to fully address these issues.

The company provides clients with trading services in FX/CFD and offers access to stocks through the RockGlobal brand.

What the FMA Accuses Rockfort Of

One of the more serious breaches involved Rockfort's product disclosure statement, which lacked mandatory information about hedging counterparties. This omission was deemed materially adverse from an investor's perspective, potentially impacting their ability to assess the risks associated with Rockfort's products.

The court also found that Rockfort had failed to maintain the same standard of capability, governance, and compliance that it had demonstrated during its initial license application. For seven months, the company operated with only one director instead of the required three, leading to significant governance issues.

Rockfort had argued that its breaches were not material and that a more lenient regulatory response would have been appropriate. However, Justice Edwards dismissed these arguments, noting the company's history of non-compliance and the FMA's escalating interventions over time.

The FMA has imposed additional conditions on Rockfort and requested that the company close out its remaining open derivatives contracts with customers ahead of the license cancellation. This move aims to protect investors and ensure an orderly wind-down of Rockfort's derivatives business.

New Zealand’s FMA seems to follow in the footsteps of its Australian counterpart and is seeking consultation on making derivatives safer for consumers. In June, it proposed a new law that would restrict the maximum leverage on CFDs to 30:1, similar to other developed markets, including Europe.

The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) of New Zealand has cancelled the derivative issuer license of Rockfort Markets Limited, following a dismissed appeal in the High Court. The cancellation, effective July 19, 2024, comes after five years of regulatory scrutiny and failed attempts at compliance.

New Zealand Regulator Cancels Rockfort Markets' Derivatives License After Failed Appeal

Justice Edwards of the High Court upheld the FMA's March 2023 decision to cancel Rockfort's license, citing multiple material contraventions of license obligations. The court found that Rockfort had breached at least eight of its license conditions, including failure to comply with a previous FMA Direction Order and inadequate systems for ensuring compliance with advertising regulations.

Liam Mason, FMA General Counsel
Liam Mason, FMA General Counsel

“Removing a market license is one of our most significant interventions,” said Liam Mason, FMA General Counsel. “The serious and widespread nature of the contraventions, combined with Rockfort's compliance history and lack of improvement following earlier actions, led us to conclude that Rockfort is not fit to hold a license.”

Rockfort's troubles began as early as 2019 when the FMA first raised concerns about potentially misleading advertising. Despite repeated engagements with the regulator, Rockfort failed to fully address these issues.

The company provides clients with trading services in FX/CFD and offers access to stocks through the RockGlobal brand.

What the FMA Accuses Rockfort Of

One of the more serious breaches involved Rockfort's product disclosure statement, which lacked mandatory information about hedging counterparties. This omission was deemed materially adverse from an investor's perspective, potentially impacting their ability to assess the risks associated with Rockfort's products.

The court also found that Rockfort had failed to maintain the same standard of capability, governance, and compliance that it had demonstrated during its initial license application. For seven months, the company operated with only one director instead of the required three, leading to significant governance issues.

Rockfort had argued that its breaches were not material and that a more lenient regulatory response would have been appropriate. However, Justice Edwards dismissed these arguments, noting the company's history of non-compliance and the FMA's escalating interventions over time.

The FMA has imposed additional conditions on Rockfort and requested that the company close out its remaining open derivatives contracts with customers ahead of the license cancellation. This move aims to protect investors and ensure an orderly wind-down of Rockfort's derivatives business.

New Zealand’s FMA seems to follow in the footsteps of its Australian counterpart and is seeking consultation on making derivatives safer for consumers. In June, it proposed a new law that would restrict the maximum leverage on CFDs to 30:1, similar to other developed markets, including Europe.

About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel
  • 1978 Articles
  • 47 Followers
About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian's adventure with financial markets began at the Cracow University of Economics, where he obtained his MA in finance and accounting. Starting from the retail trader perspective, he collaborated with brokerage houses and financial portals in Poland as an independent editor and content manager. His adventure with Finance Magnates began in 2016, where he is working as a business intelligence analyst.
  • 1978 Articles
  • 47 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}