Citigroup Global Markets Fined $11 Million for Faulty Ratings

Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI) concluded an $11.5 million Settlement Settlement Settlement in finance refers to the process when a buyer makes payment and receives the agreed-upon services or goods. The term is used on exchanges such as New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) when security changes hands. When the asset is transferred and placed in the new buyer's name, it is considered settled. This process could take a few hours or several days after a trade is made. It depends on the clearance process. In the United States, the settlement date for marketable stocks is usually 2 Settlement in finance refers to the process when a buyer makes payment and receives the agreed-upon services or goods. The term is used on exchanges such as New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) when security changes hands. When the asset is transferred and placed in the new buyer's name, it is considered settled. This process could take a few hours or several days after a trade is made. It depends on the clearance process. In the United States, the settlement date for marketable stocks is usually 2 Read this Term ‎with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to settle charges of ‎inaccurate research ratings of certain equity securities. ‎

Discover credible partners and premium clients at China’s leading finance event!

As part of the deal with the Wall Street self regulator, CGMI recognized ‎that it had mis-published its research ratings to customers on account ‎statements, email alerts and its online portal between from February 2011 ‎through December 2015.‎

The errors in the ratings feed that CGMI provided to its customers either ‎dropped or showed wrong ratings for some covered securities or ‎displayed ratings for other securities that the firm did not cover.‎

The mistakes affected the investment decisions based on CGMI’s ratings, ‎and violated certain firm-managed portfolio guidelines.‎

Wall Street’s industry-funded watchdog was concerned that investors relied on CGMI’s credit ratings to be objective and accurate, and ‎they naturally expected the company to audit its own published research ‎ratings.‎

In concluding the filing, Finra said that that firm issued ‎inaccurate statements regarding more than 19,000 research ‎ratings. It also emailed more than 1,000 customer alerts with inaccurate ‎ratings, and displayed wrong evaluations ‎on online portals available to ‎customers.‎

The agreement requires CGMI to pay $5.5 million to the watchdog, and at ‎least $6 million in compensation to the affected customers. The settlement ‎also included non-monetary measures, agreed on with the FINRA, designed ‎to ensure the accuracy of future credit ratings the firm issues.‎

The group has agreed to settle, however it neither admitted ‎nor denied the charges despite consenting with the order.‎

Susan Schroeder, FINRA Executive Vice President and Head of ‎Enforcement, commented: “Member firms must reasonably ensure that the research ‎rating information that they display and on which they rely to supervise ‎business activities is complete and correct. The display and use of ‎incomplete and inaccurate research ratings can have widespread, adverse ‎consequences to customers. Even when such inaccuracies are caused by ‎technology problems, firms should react quickly to address those errors.”‎